New Policy Regarding Electronic Devices

   by Georgia Heth, ACBL Director


One of the biggest problems facing tournament bridge is the perception that people are getting away with cheating. The ACBL invests a significant amount of money each year in monitoring events at the NABCs in case allegations or suspicions of cheating are raised. Chess has had incidents of cheating using electronic devices, and the World Bridge Federation has already banned electronic devices at their championships.

To respond to this problem, the ACBL Board of Directors passed the following motion at its meetings in Detroit:

The following policy will apply to all NABC events, effective July 1, 2008.

Electronic devices, excluding health related equipment, capable of sending or receiving communication, including but not limited to, headphones, earphones, cellular phones and minicomputers:

    (1) Shall not be allowed in the playing areas, adjacent hallways, rest rooms or accessible break areas; and

    (2) Shall not be used during a session.

These restrictions shall apply to all pairs, team members, captains, coaches, recorders and kibitzers and shall apply throughout any actual playing session or segment.

A violation of this policy shall result in a disciplinary penalty of one full board (12 imps at that form of scoring) for the first offense.  A second offense shall result in disqualification from the event for the pair/team.

Kibitzers violating this policy shall be removed from the playing area for the remainder of the session.

Please note:

ACBL is very serious about keeping the game honest. Many people think nothing is ever done because it takes time to gather enough evidence to successfully prosecute a case. One reason for this is that investigations must be kept secret in order to be effective. I do not know if any investigations are pending and will not know unless charges are brought.

We have all seen how successful our past turn-off-your-phone policy is -- phones go off with regularity during the game, and directing staff are reluctant to penalize. I was initially opposed to the new proposal because of the inconvenience to the players, but I was convinced of the necessity and I do not believe that anything less than the total ban will be effective. I agree that we are penalizing the masses for the infractions of a small minority, but there appears to be no other way. I am still not sure it can be successfully implemented below the level of NABC events.